What we are building
A way to run a study in minutes rather than weeks. Every result traces back to the population it came from and the reasoning that produced it.
Why we started
Every insights team we spoke to described the same gap. Large, irreversible decisions get proper fieldwork. Everyday decisions get a meeting and a guess. In between sits a long list of questions that are worth answering and never get asked. Each one has to earn a slot in the plan against everything else the team needs to know, and only a few slots exist.
That middle is what we are building for. Not a replacement for validation, a way to stop skipping the ninety percent of questions that never make it into a brief.
Traceable by default
Any result can be opened up: which agents answered, how they reasoned, what they were built from.
Boring about data
Client data never trains shared systems and never crosses accounts. A first study needs none of it.
Clear about the edges
We tell you what the agents cannot answer. A study that appears to answer everything is a study nobody should trust.
Behind Foresenta
Artem Kokhov
Sourabh Aggarwal
Pavel Ievlev
Anna Smirnova
This space is for you
Interested in the problem? Tell us what you would work on.
Start with one study
Tell us what you are trying to find out and we will come back with a result, not a timeline.
Subscribe to updates
Method notes, study results, and product news.